> On 8 Dec 2016, at 16:44, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I think > > Message does not exist > > Makes more sense, I always found the use of the word understood kinda weird > > > I always liked the term 'understand'. I think such anthropomorphism helps > give the system its feeling of liveness, and changed the way I thought about > programming.
+42 also “does not understand” puts the accent where it belongs: is a message *send* that is not part of object vocabulary… Esteban > > cheers -ben
