Am still finding useful stuff on Squeak wiki, sorry. The point of a Wiki is to capture discussions over a given topic and make it grow into something more structured over time. Like original c2 wiki.
Phil On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <[email protected]> wrote: > If you miss it so much we have something much better > > Github wikis, we never use > > Each of our books is hosted in a Github repo and each repo always comes > with its own wiki using very simple markdown as everything else in Github > > You do not have content but only a snippet of code to offer ? No problem > we have you covered there too create a gist for it , link it in the wiki > and we will add it back to book. Gists even offer their own version control > which means you can keep working and improving your code snippet for years > to come without braking the workflow. > > Then its a question of copy pasting the contents to pillar and adding them > in our books , or if you do not mind the extra work write it in pillar > directly and add it to the relevant book > > All books can be added to CI and generate automagically html pages for > direct access , we do this already with PBE 5. > > Our Pharo "wiki" is easier to use and far more powerful than anything > Squeak ever had, no offence intended of course to the original creators and > maintainers of Squeak wiki. > > Also github offers hosting of static webpages we could have a website > hosted as github repo made with pillar that link to all wikis, gists and > book artifacts. I can create this in an hour of work its not big deal. I > would have done this myself but Stef already has added the books to > Pharo.org which I find is more or less the same thing. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:15 PM [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I miss the Squeak wiki Pharo style. >> >> Phil >> >> Le 10 févr. 2017 19:06, "Esteban A. Maringolo" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> 2017-02-10 14:59 GMT-03:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: >> > Mass adoption and hyper reduced friction to get people on board. >> > >> > For me: I have 10+ slack teams in my slack client and there is really no >> > point in having more clients on the desktop. >> >> +1 to this. This is key. >> >> Maybe what we're missing is a simple wiki to collect the shared >> knowledge, recipes, and other stuff. >> >> >> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >>
