> On 19 Jan 2017, at 00:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
Hi!
> wow… this is super good, Holger, I want this since ages !
Great. The obs people will create a pharo organization for us.
> merge is done.
> there are 5 failing tests (and I still do not configure the tests for
> 64bits)… I will work a bit on this this week, but I’m finishing 3 things at
> the same time now (FFI 64bits, iceberg multi-remotes and this) so it will
> arrive… anytime soon.
What is the state of the unit tests and which tests fail? Are these genuine
regressions compared to the Pharo5 VM?
> I wouldn’t wait until the tests are running :)
I am struggling with the squeak-vm build system right now. It is doing so many
things in a non-standard way and it is getting more and not less. I am
currently struggling with the install part.
To illustrate the challenge:
* Standard systems would use DESTDIR as variable to not directly install to
/usr/bin/foo but $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/foo. Squeakvm has only "prefix"
* There is a script to rename "squeak" to "pharo" after things were installed
* It creates a "squeak" shell script that tries to find the real squeak, this
will make dual (64bit, 32bit) installation more hard as well...
let's see how far I get today
holger
