frank is it a browser plugin? On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 4 May 2017 at 08:55, askoh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for digging out the various possibilities. It is >> heartening >> to know the community is healthy and engaging. >> >> Let me summarize the possibilities: >> 1) Recompile Smalltalk VM from C to WebAssembly to run inside a browser at >> near native speed. This means a complete Smalltalk IDE inside a browser >> with >> full access to the browser innards. >> > > It's not WebAssembly but Squeak running in a browser is already old news, > thanks to Bert Freudenberg - see http://try.squeak.org/#url= > http://files.squeak.org/5.0/&zip=[Squeak5.0-15113.zip, > SqueakV50.sources.zip] and https://squeak.js.org/. I don't know about > interop between that image running in the browser, and the browser itself. > > frank > > >> 2) Embed Chromium or ChromeHeadless or WebKit inside the Smalltalk IDE. >> Browser access is through the exposed APIs. >> 3) Enhance Scamper, a basic browser written in Smalltalk, to include more >> and more of the capabilities of Chrome say. >> >> All the best, >> Aik-Siong Koh >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Smalltal >> k-Internet-Browser-tp4944879p4945606.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >
