If I understand the proposal correctly, something similar was tried in project Lively Kernel (https://www.lively-kernel.org/), which is dead since long and was marginally relevant perhaps only in the academic field and not at all in the real world.
Personally, I think there are better ways to spend the scarce but otherwise good human resources involved in the Smalltalk world: but anyway, good luck. Greetings Raffaello On 04/05/17 17:55, askoh wrote: > Thanks everyone for digging out the various possibilities. It is heartening > to know the community is healthy and engaging. > > Let me summarize the possibilities: > 1) Recompile Smalltalk VM from C to WebAssembly to run inside a browser at > near native speed. This means a complete Smalltalk IDE inside a browser with > full access to the browser innards. > 2) Embed Chromium or ChromeHeadless or WebKit inside the Smalltalk IDE. > Browser access is through the exposed APIs. > 3) Enhance Scamper, a basic browser written in Smalltalk, to include more > and more of the capabilities of Chrome say. > > All the best, > Aik-Siong Koh > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-Internet-Browser-tp4944879p4945606.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
