On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/05/17 04:38, Ben Coman wrote: > >> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Stephan Eggermont >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> So this was copying files at the OS level? Which OS? >> > > MacOS. > > The smaller size of the archive without compression was a surprise. i.e. >> two-thirds empty space in filesystem blocks... >> > > Why is that a surprise? Most methods are a lot smaller than 4K Lets say minor-surprise. It just wasn't at the forefront of my thoughts to expect this. > > > File by file copy to a USB stick. Wow! Yes, thats over an hour. >> > > I used a Samsung T3, which is somewhat faster than most sticks. > > But I guess your primary drive is SSD? So you don't get to bypass the >> issue using archvies? >> What result do you get cloning pharo-core like my first test case? >> > > real 0m40.270s > user 0m6.174s > sys 0m18.002s > > on a slow wifi/dsl on a MBP13 mid 2014 2.6 i5 About the same was mine then. Hopefully that means Iceberg won't suffer much. Does your "tar" results match mine also? cheers -ben
