Hi Rajula, On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:38:42PM -0700, Rajula Vineet wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Alistair Grant [via Smalltalk] <ml+[hidden email]> > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 7:29 PM > To: Rajula Vineet Reddy(IMT2014045) > Subject: Re: The new implementation of current working directory > > Hi Rajula, > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:42:02AM -0700, Rajula Vineet wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > As I have already been posting about my GSoC work and updates on my > blog > > <https://vineetreddy.wordpress.com> and on the mailing list > > <<a href="http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro= > search_page&node=1294792&query=gsoc+Rajula+&days=0" > target="_top" rel="nofollow" id="LPlnk372500" > previewremoved="true">http:// > forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=search_page&node=1294792& > query=gsoc+Rajula+&days=0> > > . In this post, I would like to go in depth of my work on 'the working > > directory' so that I can get valuable feedback and suggestions from > > everyone. This discussion was started on an github PR > > <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/96> which was conflicting > my > > PR. > > > It looks like my concerns were unfounded, but many thanks for taking the > trouble to follow up on this. > > > Not a problem. Indeed thanks for making me do it. I got to learn something new > and improved my knowledge on this issue. > > It would good if you could keep a similar caching strategy to the one I > introduced as the performance gains can be significant (as suggested by > Cyril's comment). > > > Yeah. Sure. I have used the same caching strategy and made changes to my pull > request. > > Thanks again, > Alistair > > Thank you, > Rajula
Great! I'm looking forward to updating my scripts to use this instead of my current hack. Thanks again, Alistair
