Hi Frank,
I'd guess you anticipated this astute comment as well: What would you be willing to pay for a professionally commented, functioning, and documented PharoJS? Maybe offer that amount to the projects devs and see if they are willing to develop the system you want to use. Its hard to eat on internet forum complaints alone. Good luck getting it sorted out Paul Frank-B wrote > Andreas, > > you are most likely right, although I do not really qualify as a judge, > because I have little experience with the code on these platforms. But > this has always been my impression, too. > > On the other hand, I am sure that the average Smalltakers stands way above > the average developer when it comes to intelligence, programming skills > and a lot of other factors. This is another reason why so many developers > don't really understand "o-o" and are mostly unable to abstract things > and, as a consequence from this, are not really able to use Smalltalk > "properly". > > On the negative side is that most Smalltalkers work rather as "lonesome > wolfs" and, at best, in very small teams and very very few work on > standard products meant to be used by a large or very large number of > end-users. That has mostly been my goal over the last 20 years. > > Still, all of this is no excuse for violating the very first developer's > commandment: "Thou shall document thy code" > > Mit herzlichen Grüßen > Frank -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoJS-crashes-at-first-try-tp4960686p4960720.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
