On 4 October 2017 at 17:27, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote:
> Igor Stasenko wrote > > IMO, best would be to make it via compiler plugin. > > It seems there is always a tension between newbie-friendliness/purity and > max-performance/deployment. There are so many other things about a > Smalltalk > image that are insecure and any compiler "tricks" are additional places to > hang up the sizable community that doesn't need that security or > efficiency. > Would it be possible to implement it as Sven suggested and then provide a > compiler plugin as part of a deployment hardening process like we used to > have where e.g. tools are disabled, etc? > > Of course, you can have both: - the actual implementation of message as fallback when compiler plugin is not present - the compiler plugin that does the magic, following same semantics > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
