Hi, > On Oct 26, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter Uhnák wrote >> But in both cases #, is sent to FileReference/Petit parser instance, so it >> is contained. >> You would use it on a (generic) Number and tie it to specific Bloc >> meaning. > > Yes, this is exactly the problem. It is a reintroduction of a message like > #name, which plagued us for so long. We appropriate the meaning of `aNumber, > …` for the whole world. Now, if in MyCoolProject I want to implement > aNumber>>#, I will break the system. Maybe we can follow the FS/PP pattern > and scope the message to only-vector-like-things via an initial message, so > just like `$f asParser, …`, have `1 {vector-appropriate-message}, …`?
You mean like sending @ to a number, right? :) Doru > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
