Excellent decision Doru! Thanks!!!! Alexandre
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Thanks everyone for the nice discussion. > > So, after all arguments, we will remove Number>>, from Bloc. > > I think using Number>>, for vector creation makes quite some sense. However, > we have already seen that we have a few places where we have vectors: Bloc, > PolyMath and Moose-Algos. The Bloc needs are smaller than the needs from > PolyMath (we need only a limited set of abilities). So, until we have one > consensus of having one vector in the image, we can leave room for playing. > > In the meantime we have: > > 1. > BlVector x: 10 y: 20 > BlVector x: 10 y: 20 z: 30 > > or: > > 2. > (10@20) asBlocVector > (10@20@30) asBlocVector > > The 2nd option reads ok, but it has the downside that it needs an extra > object (the point). > > An interesting thing about Number>>@ is that it is backed by a primitive. > This can be quite relevant and I think it would be worthwhile thinking about > vector/matrix specific optimizations as well. That is why, in the future, it > would be interesting to consider primitives for vector/matrix creation. > > Cheers, > Doru > > >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:10 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote: >> >> Tudor Girba-2 wrote >>> You mean like sending @ to a number, right? :) >> >> Ha ha, you got me ;) >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be > done." > >
