> Le 29 janv. 2018 à 14:16, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> a écrit : > > I hear Iceberg UI is getting a redesign. > To feed into that... I'm trying to analyse myself, why I've not been > comfortable with the "Synchronise..." menu item. I think maybe its > because that term feels like an "action" that going to "do something" > when I'm not sure what that something is. But as I'm getting > familiar with Iceberg it seems that "Synchronise" might not change the > state of anything, but first shows current "status" like a combination > of `git status` and `git diff` from the shell, and presents buttons > and tabs where you *then* perform actions that actually change the > state of the system. > > So I may have the wrong end of the stick, but perhaps replacing > "Synchronise..." with "Status..." might seem less intimidating.
Why not « Synchronization view » like in Eclipse?