On 29 January 2018 at 21:32, Christophe Demarey <christophe.dema...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> Le 29 janv. 2018 à 14:16, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> a écrit : >> >> I hear Iceberg UI is getting a redesign. >> To feed into that... I'm trying to analyse myself, why I've not been >> comfortable with the "Synchronise..." menu item. I think maybe its >> because that term feels like an "action" that going to "do something" >> when I'm not sure what that something is. But as I'm getting >> familiar with Iceberg it seems that "Synchronise" might not change the >> state of anything, but first shows current "status" like a combination >> of `git status` and `git diff` from the shell, and presents buttons >> and tabs where you *then* perform actions that actually change the >> state of the system. >> >> So I may have the wrong end of the stick, but perhaps replacing >> "Synchronise..." with "Status..." might seem less intimidating. > > Why not « Synchronization view » like in Eclipse?
I don't know Eclipse, only `git` ;P But yes, that seems less like system state might change immediately and I'll have time to consider my next move. cheers -ben
