2018-02-18 22:01 GMT+01:00 Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>:
> Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But whatever the bug, why saving in the package-cache? > > The package-cache is just a cache as the name tells. > > It's less volatile than RAM, but can still be subject to aggressive > cleanup. > > Because it is much more reliable than network, and it depends on simpler > and working infrastructure. The package cache is deliberately not cleaned, > and not shared by default. > > Stephan > > > If it would be me, I would then go for my own MCDirectoryRepository. These are my files, I want to be in control and manage them by myself. Eventually save them on another medium, and not mix them with thousands of other files that generally populate a package-cache. Do you see what I mean?
