2018-02-18 22:01 GMT+01:00 Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>:

> Nicolas Cellier
> <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But whatever the bug, why saving in the package-cache?
> > The package-cache is just a cache as the name tells.
> > It's less volatile than RAM, but can still be subject to aggressive
> cleanup.
>
> Because it is much more reliable than network, and it depends on simpler
> and working infrastructure. The package cache is deliberately not cleaned,
> and not shared by default.
>
> Stephan
>
>
> If it would be me, I would then go for my own MCDirectoryRepository.
These are my files, I want to be in control and manage them by myself.
Eventually save them on another medium, and not mix them with thousands of
other files that generally populate a package-cache.
Do you see what I mean?

Reply via email to