It's a great new! But why it's not a 6.2 version? It would be more clear since this is continuation of version 6 with new changes. How one would revert to original 6.1 if this new version isn't working for him?
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 09:56 Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent! Thanks! > > Alexandre > > > On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You don't even need to refresh the list; downloading a particular pharo > version (5, 6, 7, ...) always downloads the latest image version available. > > This has been the case for years. Normally you only need to update > PharoLauncher every major release (so e.g. once Pharo 7 is released, etc.) > > > > Peter > > > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Alexandre Bergel < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > In "official distributions", just download a new Pharo 61 version from > > > the launcher and it will be this version by default. > > > > > > It should be build 60540 I think. > > > > I do not quite understand. I installed the launcher several months ago. > Should I update the launcher? I think no. > > I see Pharo 6.1(stable), but I am not sure which build it is exactly. > > > > If I refresh the template list, does it ensure that I will have the last > Pharo 6.1? > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > >> Alexandre > > >> -- > > >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > > >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > > >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20944/Integrate-Epicea-8-2-8-in-Ph6-1 > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cyril Ferlicot > > > https://ferlicot.fr > > > > > > > > > > > >
