Ah, I forget to say that this change we enter in effect today :)
May the force be with us.

Esteban

> On 28 Nov 2018, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ok, a new pass onto this, I decided that having just dev-Etc. branches and 
> not having a clear stable one may lead to confusion. 
> After checking some projects on GitHub, seems that what they do is to name 
> their branches just with the version, not with “dev” (like, for example 
> "gtk-2.22”).
> 
> So, I will name the version based branchs “Pharo7.0”, “Pharo8.0” and so on.
> 
> (Without dash to keep coherence with the artefact naming)
> 
> Cheers!
> Esteban
> 
> 
>> On 22 Nov 2018, at 13:25, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 22 Nov 2018, at 13:21, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 22 Nov 2018, at 12:48, Christophe Demarey <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Why not following git flow?
>>>> Keep the development branch for dev and open a 70-release branch to 
>>>> prepare the release.
>>>> This way, there is no change for most people.
>>> 
>>> Because our scripts are automated in branch and tag basis. 
>>> dev-7.0 will generate SNAPSHOT versions for files.pharo.org/70 
>>> <http://files.pharo.org/70> and tags (v7.0.0-rc1, for example) will 
>>> generate a release.
>>> 
>>> We could have another flow, but this was what we decided last week and we 
>>> will try it (maybe this is wrong and we will need to change it, but well… 
>>> we’ll see… good part of having a process is that we can iterate on it :P)
>> 
>> Btw, I’m not complete happy with this either: as it is previewed now, there 
>> will not be stable branch, and I feel this is incorrect. But again… good 
>> thing is we can iterate, we’ll see if this works.
>> 
>> Esteban
>> 
>>> 
>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Christophe
>>>> 
>>>>> Le 22 nov. 2018 à 11:40, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi list,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, subject says pretty much all. 
>>>>> We are planning to release Pharo 7.0 very soon now, and while preparing 
>>>>> the release process, we came to the conclusion that we will need a branch 
>>>>> for version to develop, and because of that we will need to rename what 
>>>>> is not “development” to “dev-7.0”.
>>>>> Then, it will be a “dev-8.0” and so on…
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, be prepared to submit your PRs to dev-7.0 instead development :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Esteban
> 

Reply via email to