Now github. Stef
> On 24 Jan 2019, at 20:44, Eric Gade <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which is now the canonical place to seek out these issues/bugs: manuscript or > GitHub? > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 14:37 Torsten Bergmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > it's a nice release yes - and the best we ever provided indeed. I'm really > happy too that P7 image is an > official release now. > > > But still: > ========== > > In a post [1] in November 2017 I brought up the topic again to "increase the > quality level in Pharo 7 and onwards". > > With 762 commits [2] for Pharo 7 I devoted a lot of time in fixing often > simple and trivial things just to clean up > comments, code, typos, packages, manifests, tests and so on. > > Many others did the same and supported these cleaning efforts. This helped > adding a few more release tests to keep the > quality bar on the level reached. Special thanks to Marcus, Esteban, and many > others who helped reviewing, fighting a > shaky CI server, integrating quickly and so on ... > > Still THIS IS NOT FINISHED ... and it would be really help if more people > would participate in the cleaning or fixing bugs. > Also many external packages now need some love to work with Pharo 7. > > We have a large community with many, many users - but still only a few > contribute to the core system. > > I wonder why and would like to know: > - Is it due to the switch to git ? > - Is is due to the new contribution process? > - Is it for other reasons? > > Remember: Pharo is yours and even small steps could make a difference. So > please join! > > Thanks > T. > > > [1] > http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Quality-raising-the-quality-level-in-Pharo-7-and-onwards-tt5027111.html#none > > <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Quality-raising-the-quality-level-in-Pharo-7-and-onwards-tt5027111.html#none> > [2] https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/graphs/contributors > <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/graphs/contributors> > >
