> On 15 Jan 2020, at 14:30, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I came across the following quirk that surprised me.
>
> Positive number in a arbitrary radix
>
> 16rA = 10
>
> Same number but negative
>
> -16rA = -10
>
> I guess, we all know that.
>
> However, the following is also possible
>
> 16r-A = -10
I would not support this one either
>
> I did not know that, but OK.
>
> But what about this one ?
>
> -16r-A = 10
>
> I understand that the double negation is positive again,
> but do we really want to support such a syntax ?
I would not
>
> Sven
>
>
