On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > here is what I propose for on: > I will move your package out of the inbox so that the discussion can go on > and > I try to integrate all the other changes. > Then with bill and others you propose how to proceed. > Is it ok ?
What do you mean by 'I will move your package out of the inbox'? Do you mean you simply delete the packages or you moved them to Pharo? Replacing 'ReadStream on: smth' by 'smth readStream' is not mandatory. However, it makes the code simpler to read, avoids a direct class reference and allows different implementation of #readStream depending on the kind of collection it is sent to. I do not think anyone is against that as soon as I apply the automatic refactoring carefully. I did that and didn't see any place where the RB did a bad job. It even detected that SequenceableCollection>>readStream should not be changed to avoid infinite recursion. Do you think there is a problem that I might take care of? -- Damien Cassou Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
