On Jun 5, 2008, at 00:27 , Bill Schwab wrote:
Stef, Damien,
No surprise, I would argue that we proceed, and would also include a
rename of #next to #nextOrNil and #next: to #nextAvailable:. All
code in the image at the time should work as before.
What would be the impact on code that is not in the image? Would all
external packages need to be adapted as well or would the current
semantics be preserved?
Adrian
The next step (part B) would be to add exception-aware #next and
#next:.
Damien and I could cook it up, try it, and then return with an "all
clear."
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/4/2008 10:36 AM >>>
On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:20 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is what I propose for on:
I will move your package out of the inbox so that the discussion
can go on
and
I try to integrate all the other changes.
Then with bill and others you propose how to proceed.
Is it ok ?
What do you mean by 'I will move your package out of the inbox'? Do
you mean you simply delete the packages or you moved them to Pharo?
I mean move them to the treatedBox without putting in the image
Replacing 'ReadStream on: smth' by 'smth readStream' is not
mandatory.
However, it makes the code simpler to read, avoids a direct class
reference and allows different implementation of #readStream
depending
on the kind of collection it is sent to. I do not think anyone is
against that as soon as I apply the automatic refactoring
carefully. I
did that and didn't see any place where the RB did a bad job. It even
detected that SequenceableCollection>>readStream should not be
changed
to avoid infinite recursion.
Do you think there is a problem that I might take care of?
Now as a group how do we want to handle this case?
We give a try and trust damien?
Stef
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
