This is due to the changes introduced by
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=114
Printing not initialized Large*Integers does not work anymore. I don't
know whether this is important because in practice you probably neven
have such instances. We can either implement the old behavior or
remove the tests. What do others think?
Adrian
On Aug 20, 2008, at 14:08 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I checked and between 10050 and 10055
we introduce a bug
LargePositiveInteger new: 4
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
