Nicolas sent me a fix we will integrate it.
Stef
On Aug 20, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
This is due to the changes introduced by
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=114
Printing not initialized Large*Integers does not work anymore. I
don't know whether this is important because in practice you
probably neven have such instances. We can either implement the old
behavior or remove the tests. What do others think?
Adrian
On Aug 20, 2008, at 14:08 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I checked and between 10050 and 10055
we introduce a bug
LargePositiveInteger new: 4
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
