I agree. I spend a lot of time trying to understand Mantis reports
because there typically are duplicates and related reports and fixes
proposed are later reported being buggy etc.
Adrian
On Sep 18, 2008, at 10:43 , Marcus Denker wrote:
Hi,
bugs.squeak.org is a mess. (and people wonder why I always stress
that doing harvesting was a lot of work... we got
the tracker down to 250 entries with 3.9, if I remember correctly).
Even for 3.11, they will have some real work ahead to get this in
some form of managable shape.
Now for Pharo, I don't see that we can benefit from the bug-tracker
at all anymore: there is so much stuff, no
way to do here anything in a strategic, "all covering" way, as we
did for example when moving from BFAV to Mantis.
So if someone has reported a bug against Squeak, the only way I see
this change ending up in pharo is that the
bug is reported again on the pharo tracker. So if you want something
to be fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list
(down to 79 open issues, we already fixed and closed 96 reports)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
