On 20.09.2008, at 12:03, Norbert Hartl wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 23:15 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Sep 19, 2008, at 23:02 , Marcus Denker wrote:
On 19.09.2008, at 22:49, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
[...]
Class browser
Method finder
Message names
Do we need Message names?
hm... I almost never use it, but I know people that do quite often.
"Method finder" seems even less important (I've never used it, except
for demos ;))
I use it on a daily base. I'm now an average skilled squeaker but
still
can't remember all the funny method names. The substring search capa-
bility of method finder ofter saves my day. I think I would stop using
it if browsing a complete protocol would be a little bit more usable
than just having all possible methods. Something like that.
I think beginners will use Method finder quite often.
One thing is that "method finder" and "message names" both allow one
to search
for methods. The "method finder" in addition allows for giving
examples in the
form 3. 4. 7.
So there is definitly the problem of duplicated features here.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
