On 21.09.2008, at 18:26, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

Marcus and others

Do you think that the cs approach is good because after applying them we will have to publish
new packages?
So could you harvest these ones for example and let me know what do you think and if cs is better?
because I could produce also packages.


Packages are good, too. Just a removal package that re-classifies the methods is not good.

        Marcus

Stef

On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

Another one :)
Cleaning the inspector.

<EtoyRemoval-002-CleanInspector.2.cs>


Stef_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
Marcus Denker  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to