Ok then I will produce packages in the inbox.
I could publish directly but I would like that somebody else has a
look at what I'm doing.
Stef
On Sep 21, 2008, at 7:48 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 21.09.2008, at 18:26, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Marcus and others
Do you think that the cs approach is good because after applying
them we will have to publish
new packages?
So could you harvest these ones for example and let me know what do
you think and if cs is better?
because I could produce also packages.
Packages are good, too. Just a removal package that re-classifies
the methods is not good.
Marcus
Stef
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Another one :)
Cleaning the inspector.
<EtoyRemoval-002-CleanInspector.2.cs>
Stef_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
