On 21/10/2008, at 5:00 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
Another important class of constraints would be what packages must
not be broken e.g. must Whisker still work?, and thus what packages
can/should be removed.
who said that?
No one. It was a hypothetical.
have a look at the code and you will get the answer.
No giant spagetthi code in pharo.
I do not want to argue endlessly on that. Squeak is the forum for
that kind of discussions.
I'm not arguing one way or the other, and as you (Stéphane) know, I'm
doing a much more brutal pruning. I'm *only* suggesting that you
develop some guidelines and principles that are objective, measurable,
reasonable (as in, useful in reasoning) and useful for decision
making, to guide the development and work that goes into Pharo.
Antony Blakey
--------------------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Lack of will power has caused more failure than lack of intelligence
or ability.
-- Flower A. Newhouse
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
