On 21/10/2008, at 5:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

for the vision behind pharo
imagine all the implications behind

        • Better for the better
        • Beauty to learn from
        • Not backward compatible
        • Clean, lean and fast

We want a system in which
        - we can plug different UI frameworks
- clean network, clean file system, clean fonts, clean events, clean compiler...
        - that we could bootstrap: this is one of the goal also
- with robust software engineering practices (packages with documentation, tests, smalllint rules attached).

But 'imagining implications' isn't really useful as objective input into decision making, or anything that you can measure progress, or even success against. I'll just point to the decision about FreeType - where are the goals/constraints from which that decision follows?

Anyway, I'm not trying to piss anyone off, so I'll bow out of this discussion.

Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787

The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
  -- Martin Luther King



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to