On 02.11.2008, at 16:09, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 02.11.2008, at 15:16, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi guys
I would be interesting to understand
hese two points:
- times repeat changes
There is no change of timesRepeat: in the image (and in the
changeset). It has no versions other the _ to := rewrite. Thus
there has been no wrong version of timesRepeat: at any point in Pharo.
- hex removal (I do not remember why we removed it).
The only sender of hex: was the method asHTMLColor, in Pharo, this
was changed (bf) to not call hex: anymore.
I guess this change removed the hex:, as there where no senders.
It seems to have been harvested from this Squeak bugreport:
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6936
I personally think the critique we see down is far too harsh. If you
had no bugs in 3.9, then this is because
you used a stable, released version of 3.9. There is no such version
of Pharo yet. If you would have used an unstable
version of 3.9, you would have seen bugs, too.
I added a bugreport: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=309
But I really wonder how people came to the idea that any and each
small interation of pharo needs to be bug-free...
This reaction of the Squeak community to destroy anyone who dares to
make a small mistake (and even calling this a mistake is a stretch)
is very strange. One thing to learn in the Squeak community: Talking
is good, Doing is bad. I only wonder how one will have a future with
that kind
of attitude.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
