On 03.11.2008, at 10:55, Serge Stinckwich wrote:

2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones

Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which will be packaged as a one-click image, "Pharo-IDE". And the one where the actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE. Using DEV is ambiguous because its not clear whether this image is supposed to develop
applications or Pharo itself.

Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
Why not Pharo-stable and Pharo-unstable ?


It's not the stability that distinguishes the two. The CORE does not have
Omnibrower and RB and things like that.

        Marcus

--
Marcus Denker  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to