Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the "IDE" image,
which includes all the productivity tools like autocompletion and
syntax highlighting (for a list see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages)
. However, for a Seaside server I would rather use the core to
reduce the memory footprint.
I tend to agree with Serge on this. Having IDE in the name might be
confusing for people.
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
