I read my email the wrong way. See the answer of adrian and frankly I imagine somebody at ViewPoints collecting home made liberal licenses.....
I **hate** licenses certainly much more than you and I got ***BURNED*** during years because of the license of Squeak I have folder full of crap to get Squeak presentation accepted at Linux days I hate the lawer oriented view they impose on us this is why I took mit and period. Stef On Dec 20, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Keith Hodges wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> now the questions are >> - is it really that difficult to agree for a project on a given >> simple license such as MIT? >> - I also hate licenses since they polute our lives but I just don't >> care and signed MIT >> - should we accept this kind of license (of course it is compatible >> with MIT) >> but this looks a door open to the mess. >> >> I'm not sure squeakers realized that after all the effort of yohsiki >> to get SqueakEtoys clean >> 3.11 could be WTFPL because keith commit on it. >> > Thats a complete load of rubbish. > > No. 1 I dont see any need for profanity. > > No. 2 my licence is not like GNU, please dont say it is because you > will > just confuse people. > Its freer than MIT because I don't care if you take my code and sell > it > as your own. You can even say you wrote it if you like. The > responsibility for what you do with it is yours not mine. > > Keith >> I'm quite convinced that they will boycott such a code. >> >> Stef >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
