So keith could you publish your code in WTF and MIT? Note that any code publish to the squeak mantis is MIT and not WTF Stef
On Dec 20, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > my feeling is that there should be a single license that is agreed to > and signed by everyone. I hate the fact that we are discussing > licenses. Given the mess that Squeak licensing got into I don't > propose there is any choice on the matter. Also, the documentation on > the web sites seems to be very clear on this matter. > > cheers, > > Mike > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Keith, >> >> Its nothing against your license (I think its cool). Its just that we >> initially decided that whoever contributes needs to sign the >> agreement. Like this, we will not have to discuss licenses over and >> over again. Now imagine, that every second Pharo contributor comes >> with his own license. Even if it is more liberal, it just adds >> complexity to the process and makes us discuss this topic, like we do >> now. I would prefer to fix a bug instead... >> >> Hence, if you could sign the "official" agreement, that would be >> great. >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> On Dec 20, 2008, at 13:09 , Keith Hodges wrote: >> >>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>> now the questions are >>>> - is it really that difficult to agree for a project on a given >>>> simple license such as MIT? >>>> - I also hate licenses since they polute our lives but I just >>>> don't >>>> care and signed MIT >>>> - should we accept this kind of license (of course it is >>>> compatible >>>> with MIT) >>>> but this looks a door open to the mess. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure squeakers realized that after all the effort of >>>> yohsiki >>>> to get SqueakEtoys clean >>>> 3.11 could be WTFPL because keith commit on it. >>>> >>> Thats a complete load of rubbish. >> >>> No. 1 I dont see any need for profanity. >>> >>> No. 2 my licence is not like GNU, please dont say it is because you >>> will >>> just confuse people. >>> >>> Its freer than MIT because I don't care if you take my code and sell >>> it >>> as your own. You can even say you wrote it if you like. The >>> responsibility for what you do with it is yours not mine. >>> >>> Keith >>>> I'm quite convinced that they will boycott such a code. >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
