I do not understand what you are saying.
> p.s. One of the goals of LPF for all images is to provide a platform > that enables new code NOT to have to be backwardly compatible since > LPF > can take up the slack. I find it ironic that Pharo is suffering from > backward compataibility issues, and I have to put "respondsTo:" > just to > cover pharo's back. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
