+ 1 On 5 Jan 2009, at 14:53, Gary Chambers wrote:
> Can't remember the number of times I've had to implement these kinds > of > generally useful methods on various Smalltalk dialects (particularly > #groupedBy:, called it #categorizedBy: myself ;-) ). Really should > be part > of all Smalltalks. I'd push for general adoption/standardisation for > every > dialect! That's the only way Smalltalk is going to evolve, the "ANSI > standard" is years behind! > > Regards, Gary. > >> >> So why do we do pharo. Really. If everything as to be compatible with >> other >> smalltalk. Terrible. >> Can't we get smarter? >> Why can't we tag the methods with <notAnsi> and build a tool that >> check when you >> do a fill out. I do not write code to be portable to VisualWorks so? >> >>> I would prefer to have such extension methods separate from the >>> core. >> >> Me not. Because then in a lot of places I will have to inline their >> body. >> >> Stef >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
