On Jan 6, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: >> So why do we do pharo. Really. If everything as to be compatible with >> other smalltalk. Terrible. >> Can't we get smarter? > > You are right, this change does not harm anyone not using the method. > > We'll have to update our tests of methods not to be sent. > > Still, I would rather like to see methods removed from Collection > than added.
Yes can you make a list of the ones that are conflicting with other implementations? >> Why can't we tag the methods with <notAnsi> and build a tool that >> check when you do a fill out. > > The problem is that such message sends can't be reliably detected > statically. I lost me here. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
