As far as I remember, the scripting syntax of GNU Smalltalk is very close to the changeset's. I think that the syntax is not the most relevant part of this work. What is critical in my opinion, is to have a robust scripting facility. I do not want to use jruby to do the scripting I need to do.
Cheers, Alexandre On 20 Jan 2009, at 15:43, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:23:28PM +0100, Gwenael Casaccio wrote: >> I've published an initial release of Pharo scripting you cant get >> this release >> here : http://www.squeaksource.com/SaphirScripting. I would like >> to thanks >> *Mathieu Suen* who has done a very good work and give me a lot of >> help !!! > > Is the scripting syntax the same as used by Gnu Smalltalk? It > would be convenient to have the same syntax work on both > > -- > Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
