> No, it is not: > http://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual/html_node/Syntax.html > > It looks like it is indeed quite similar to the saphir syntax
Indeed. I think Paolo changes the syntax on some point. Last time I checked it (few years ago), it employed bangs (!) > > >> I think that the syntax is not the most relevant part of this work. >> What is critical in my opinion, is to have a robust scripting >> facility. I do not want to use jruby to do the scripting I need to >> do. > > It is useful, yes. However, I don't see where it fits in the > Squeak UI of browsers and Monticello. Perhaps some borrowing > from NewSpeak is necessary in this case Why should it fits in the Squeak UI or browsers? Often I have to write few and simple scripts to perform an actions on my files, or simply to provide a textual calculator. Currently I use jruby. But as Stef said, we should not make such debate here. Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
