[email protected] wrote: > Why not just add the plugin's to the VMMaker package? > > I don't see any gain for having another official plugin package besides > VMMaker. It'll have the main problem and advantage of VMMaker of > central ownership.
That's not what I suggested, just a naming scheme. I also don't think that all plugins will be centrally maintained, as that would require write access of every plugin maintainer to the VM repository. Michael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
