Ok so do we following the seaside way or the other? Once we get decided I will do a pass and be compliant :)
Stef > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 15:33 , Michael Rueger wrote: > >> Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> so what are the organizations we can use? >>> Ideally I would like to have the test associated with their >>> packages. >>> >>> XXX >>> XXXTests >> >> The problem with that naming scheme is that then the tests would >> always >> be loaded together with their tests because of the simple string >> matching Monticello does. >> Which isn't something you want when doing application/runtime builds. >> >> That's why I proposed the Plugin-* and Tests-* naming schemes. > > +1 > > Adrian > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
