Hi matthew

what is the base for 4.0 is is 3.10? or spoonish?

> Squeak 4.0 will be the first official squeak release with no
> code under SqueakL; everything in the .image, .changes, and
> .sources files will be under either the MIT license or the
> Apache license.
>
> I've done the first step and done a full audit, using Yoshiki's
> tools [1], of all the code
> in Squeak 3.10.2, with the exception of four packages:
> - Monticello
> - SUnit, TestRunner, and SUnitImproved
> - Universes
> - Traits

Traits have always been release under MIT and Squeak/L
We signed the license agreement long time ago so I do not really  
understand the point.

>
>
> I also applied all of yoshiki's etoys changes to 3.10.2. The
> algorithm that Yoshiki seemed to follow when cleaning etoys is:
> - If the method can be easily deleted, delete it
> - Otherwise, use the historical image [1] to revert to the
>  latest version before the problematic author
> - Fix any bugs this causes
>
> I think we can use the same procedure. Perhaps Yoshiki will
> comment.
>
> So, to help with the relicense, grab the historical image[1],
> check out the license audit [2], leave a note on mantis about
> what you think you'll work on, and start rolling out change
> sets. For your convenience, all of the license audits are
> included both in the relicensing tools download and on mantis.
> I'll try to keep both up to date as we progress with the
> relicense
>
> I'll also be looking for an official license statement from the
> authors of Traits and Universes; if those can be unambiguously
> shown to be MIT-licensed, it will save me a couple of audits.
> SUnit and Monticello already have enough problems that I know
> they are not clean.
>
> [1] The tools I've been using to do the relicense:
>    http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0alpha/squeak4.0-relicensingTools.zip
>    see also:
>    
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-September/131586.html
>    http://www.squeaksource.com/MethodAuthorship.html
>
> [2] The 4.0 relicense mantis issue:
>    http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6989
>
> -- 
> Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to