Matthew where did you get the list of people that signed the MIT agreement? I asked several times but never got any answer.
Stef On Feb 7, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > Squeak 4.0 is within sight. With this release, the four-year > relicensing project of the Leadership team will be complete. We > will be able to incorporate under SFLC, and Pharo will be one > step closer to a 1.0 release. > > Squeak 4.0 will be the first official squeak release with no > code under SqueakL; everything in the .image, .changes, and > .sources files will be under either the MIT license or the > Apache license. > > I've done the first step and done a full audit, using Yoshiki's > tools [1], of all the code > in Squeak 3.10.2, with the exception of four packages: > - Monticello > - SUnit, TestRunner, and SUnitImproved > - Universes > - Traits > > I also applied all of yoshiki's etoys changes to 3.10.2. The > algorithm that Yoshiki seemed to follow when cleaning etoys is: > - If the method can be easily deleted, delete it > - Otherwise, use the historical image [1] to revert to the > latest version before the problematic author > - Fix any bugs this causes > > I think we can use the same procedure. Perhaps Yoshiki will > comment. > > So, to help with the relicense, grab the historical image[1], > check out the license audit [2], leave a note on mantis about > what you think you'll work on, and start rolling out change > sets. For your convenience, all of the license audits are > included both in the relicensing tools download and on mantis. > I'll try to keep both up to date as we progress with the > relicense > > I'll also be looking for an official license statement from the > authors of Traits and Universes; if those can be unambiguously > shown to be MIT-licensed, it will save me a couple of audits. > SUnit and Monticello already have enough problems that I know > they are not clean. > > [1] The tools I've been using to do the relicense: > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0alpha/squeak4.0-relicensingTools.zip > see also: > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-September/131586.html > http://www.squeaksource.com/MethodAuthorship.html > > [2] The 4.0 relicense mantis issue: > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6989 > > -- > Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
