Bill Schwab wrote: > Stef, > > Re Dolphin, class categories have long been of marginal use; I'll speak for > myself on that but suspect others would agree. I am a Dolphin Pro, Squeak and Pharo users, I agree.
Travis > Packages are of course extremely useful. Method categories are also quite > useful, and Dolphin allows multiple categories to be assigned to a given > method. Dolphin mixes virtual categories (computed by rules) with static > ones maintained by the user (and serialized as part of packages). > > I can easily see where OB would get quite a speed boost out of it. > > Bill > > > > > > Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. > University of Florida > Department of Anesthesiology > PO Box 100254 > Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 > > Email: [email protected] > Tel: (352) 273-6785 > FAX: (352) 392-7029 > > > >>>> [email protected] 2/10/2009 4:41:10 PM >>> >>>> > Alexandre implemented long time ago an hybrid model where both kind of > packages could coexist > and we should probably revive it for 1.1 > > Stef > On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > > >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, David Röthlisberger <[email protected] >> >>> wrote: >>> >> So if we had real packages in Pharo as first class entities, OB >> would be much faster >> and simpler to maintain. Right now, OB models packages and class >> cats itself, has to >> take the information from both the Monticello's working copy >> managers and the >> SystemOrganizer. This is a mess and a huge pain, but what can we do. >> We should really invest in bringing real packages to Pharo. >> >> >> If you want "real" packages, I've implemented them in Squeak: >> >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Packages >> >> The places the code is held, including a video and a Squeak image is >> linked from here: >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak >> >> I'm not interested in Pharo, but the code is there and is released >> under the MIT license if anybody else wants it. >> >> Gulik. >> >> -- >> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.20/1943 - Release Date: 02/10/09 > 07:20:00 > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
