I hate not having a real namespace. I hate to call my class DBXConnection instead of Connection. I think namespaces are very useful. Something like Java packages or similar would be grate for me.
Cheers, Mariano On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Travis Kay <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Schwab wrote: > > Stef, > > > > Re Dolphin, class categories have long been of marginal use; I'll speak > for myself on that but suspect others would agree. > I am a Dolphin Pro, Squeak and Pharo users, I agree. > > Travis > > > Packages are of course extremely useful. Method categories are also > quite useful, and Dolphin allows multiple categories to be assigned to a > given method. Dolphin mixes virtual categories (computed by rules) with > static ones maintained by the user (and serialized as part of packages). > > > > I can easily see where OB would get quite a speed boost out of it. > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. > > University of Florida > > Department of Anesthesiology > > PO Box 100254 > > Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Tel: (352) 273-6785 > > FAX: (352) 392-7029 > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected] 2/10/2009 4:41:10 PM >>> > >>>> > > Alexandre implemented long time ago an hybrid model where both kind of > > packages could coexist > > and we should probably revive it for 1.1 > > > > Stef > > On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, David Röthlisberger <[email protected] > >> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >> So if we had real packages in Pharo as first class entities, OB > >> would be much faster > >> and simpler to maintain. Right now, OB models packages and class > >> cats itself, has to > >> take the information from both the Monticello's working copy > >> managers and the > >> SystemOrganizer. This is a mess and a huge pain, but what can we do. > >> We should really invest in bringing real packages to Pharo. > >> > >> > >> If you want "real" packages, I've implemented them in Squeak: > >> > >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces > >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Packages > >> > >> The places the code is held, including a video and a Squeak image is > >> linked from here: > >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak > >> > >> I'm not interested in Pharo, but the code is there and is released > >> under the MIT license if anybody else wants it. > >> > >> Gulik. > >> > >> -- > >> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg > >> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.20/1943 - Release Date: > 02/10/09 07:20:00 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
