> Squeaksource > SqueakMap/Universes > Sake/Packages > Monticello 1, 1.5, 2? > It gets even murkier :) I have now just stumbled on SourceTalk as being the "new" SqueakSource? Is Pharo Smalltalk actually planning to use Monticello 1 or 2? What is Pharo Smalltalk's view of SourceTalk? Why not "use" SourceTalk for Pharo Smalltalk? -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Distributed-versioning-...-MonticelloHub--tp2319149p2344603.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... ... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Geert
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Keith Hodges
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Damien Cassou
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Damien Cassou
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Keith Hodges
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed version... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... ... Geert
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Monticell... Ramon Leon
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Mont... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... ... Ramon Leon
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-project] Distributed versioning ... Mont... Stéphane Ducasse
