> You are wrong about Sake I think. I know Sake. I've written a generator for builder.seaside.st. The result (or a modified version of it) is included with the Sake distribution as Seaside29Builder.
> Sake can declare a universe of > known-to-work-together packages. Just take a class, declare the sake > tasks you know work together in the image you target and things will > be as in universe. Sure, you can use Sake to build something very similar to a Universe. However tasks are not declarative, but instead use a script to perform some actions. In most cases they call Installer to find and load an appropriate version (what is already scary in itself). I understand that Package Universe is too restrictive for some cases, however I wouldn't dare to replace it with Sake. Sake depends on a stack of hacks, it even uses its own compiler to allow uppercase method names. In the small codebase Code Critics finds 14 serious bugs like non existing inst-variable references and message sents that are not implemented anywhere. Of course there is not a single test. The way Sake calculates dependencies is totally strange, I am not sure if it is even correct. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
