> It doesn't depend upon that compiler hack. That hack provides the > ability to put textual data in as an appendix to a method. It is an > entirely independent facility that could be perhaps better included > as a > trait for those that want it.
I do not get that? I use it when I want to use methods to be a mini database, in the Mantis > > package, and for Bob to be able to manages build scripts in the image > without having to enclose in quotes and escape quotes. > >> In the small codebase Code Critics finds 14 serious bugs >> like non existing inst-variable references and message sents that are >> > I don't think it is fair to use code critics as an argument. To me it > appears that you have developed all of these tools for your own use. I > have never even seen you announce their existence to squeak-dev. > Where > is the documentation? >> not implemented anywhere. Of course there is not a single test. > What are you talking about: Sake-Tests. >> The >> way Sake calculates dependencies is totally strange, I am not sure if >> it is even correct. >> > Again, what do you mean? There are two algorithms in use. The first is > lifted directly from rake. The second is stolen directly from > universes. > > Keith > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
