Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
> 
>> slightly shorter it is the fork in the road:
>>
>> are you committing to Pharo or Squeak?
> 
> I did not get that?
> commited :)? to pharo?

Well, yes :-)
Basically meaning we need to maintain packages explicitly for Pharo.

> For MIME I would like to hear if seasider have an alternative to KOM:  
> is swazoo an ok alternative?

The problem with MIME and Kom is that Kom changes quite a few things, 
which basically require to revert most of the MIME changes.
The recursion with the mimeType method is one of them.

Michael


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to