On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Michael Rueger wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Michael Rueger wrote: >> >>> slightly shorter it is the fork in the road: >>> >>> are you committing to Pharo or Squeak? >> >> I did not get that? >> commited :)? to pharo? > > Well, yes :-) > Basically meaning we need to maintain packages explicitly for Pharo.
Yes! >> For MIME I would like to hear if seasider have an alternative to KOM: >> is swazoo an ok alternative? > > The problem with MIME and Kom is that Kom changes quite a few things, > which basically require to revert most of the MIME changes. > The recursion with the mimeType method is one of them. Arggh ok now I understand. Stef > > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
