>> Having two incompatible versions of Kom makes distribution even more
>> painful as it is today. I would prefer to have compatible versions if
>> this is possible.
>
> As I said, we are at or at least close to the point where we have to
> make the decision which version to support. If you want to have Pharo
> stay compatible with Squeak, we can just as well abandon Pharo now.
> It's as simple as that.

I am not criticizing your effort to make Kom work on Pharo. I fully
agree with you that Pharo should move forward and if necessary break
backward compatibility. My question was only if this was the case with
the changes on Kom.

Lukas

-- 
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to